6-minute video by journalist Diana Davison, who authored The Post Millennial expose’ on Nicole Prause.
The Diana Davison video provided a link to the timeline of events chronicling Prause’s nearly 7-year campaign of harassment, defamation, threats, and false accusations called “VSS Academic War Timeline.” Update – Prause got the timeline removed. Hmm… Related – Victims of Nicole Prause’s Malicious Reporting and Malicious Use of Process (PDF).
Very revealing comments under the Diana Davison video (in response to an obsessive commenter):
———————————
———————————
———————————
In response to Diana Davison’s Post Millennial expose’ Prause harasses/defames Davison, followed by a bogus Cease & Desist letter and demanding $10,000 to not file a lawsuit
As she had done with other journalists (e.g. Belinda Luscombe, Amy Fleming) Prause went on the attack, harassing, defaming and threatening Diana Davison. Prause eventually resorted to sending Davison and The Post Millennial a baseless cease & desist letter. (PDF of bogus C&D letter). We begin with Diana Davison’s original tweet linking to her article:
In No Nut November, the question “To fap or not to fap?” has become fraught with legal danger. https://t.co/Oc0AN6DmJx #NoFap #NoNutNovember
— Diana Davison (@d2davison) November 21, 2019
Davison was asked about Prause’s court filings where Prause falsely claims she never attended a porn awards show. (See this image of her (far right) on the red carpet of the 2016 X-Rated Critics Organization (XRCO) awards ceremony.) [Or view here] Davison exposes Prause as perjuring herself in her Hilton v. Prause lawsuit filings:
Prause then blocked Davison to prevent her from responding to Prause’s tweets:
Additional photo showing her at a "reserved" table inside the porn awards – so it wasn't some other red carpet event.https://t.co/SPwKCaZte2
— Diana Davison (@d2davison) November 25, 2019
Screenshots supporting everything Davison said:
- attended 2016 X-Rated Critics Organization (XRCO) awards ceremony (PDF: XRCO 2016)
- stated she had attended AVN in 2015 (PDF: AVN 2015)
- stated she planned to attend AVN in 2019 (PDF: AVN 2019)
With Davison blocked, Prause launches her tirade:
Is it a coincidence that the AVN email to Prause is dated November 21, the day The Post Millennial expose’ on Nicole Prause was published? This suggests that Prause emailed AVN and they immediately responded with the requested statement. It appears as if Prause and AVN have an ongoing relationship.
However, the AVN email fails to back up Prause’s claims. First, AVN’s email is only concerned with 2019, yet Don Hilton only contends that Prause stated she had attended AVN in 2015 (Which she did tweet in 2015). Second, the AVN response concerns itself with only RSVP tickets, not general admission. The only thing the AVN email proves is that the AVN is at Prause’s beck and call.
Prause’s tirade continues, with self-incriminating screenshots of this page: Is Nicole Prause Influenced by the Porn Industry? You can see the section she captured in her tweet here: Evidence that Nicole Prause attends porn industry awards (XRCO, AVN)
Next she tweets this gem (featuring more of her private emails with porn industry insiders):
The screenshot of the XRCO Chairman’s email to Prause from the above tweet is priceless:
Bob Krotts confirms Prause had attended XRCO (contrary to Nikky’s sworn affidavit), yet he’s not sure if she’s a “part of” the porn industry or not. Prause’s tweet contains a second screenshot – of a Davison tweet:
Davison is referring to this XRCO picture of Prause sitting at a reserved table with porn-industry friends (blonde at left behind porn star Melissa Hill):
In the same thread, ranting about the 2019 AVN (rather than 2015), and tweeting receipts supposedly showing she was in LA during the 2019 AVN (which is held in Las Vegas). However, no one said Prause attended the 2019 AVN award (even though Prause apparently once planned to attend AVN), and The Post Millennial article said nothing about either the AVN or the XRCO awards.
Prause escalates to threatening a lawsuit. None of her “evidence” counters anything tweeted by Diana Davison.
Concurrently, she tweets all the porn-industry bigwigs who are at her fingertips. Nothing suspicious here folks!
Davison responds to being blocked, then harassed by Prause:
Why does Twitter allow people who have blocked you to reply to tweets? I've got some nutter (Nicole Prause) falsely accusing me (surprise, surprise) and other people have to tell me what's going on.
— Diana Davison (@d2davison) November 25, 2019
That's some pretty bizarre kind of behaviour for a person who is a therapist.
— Diana Davison (@d2davison) November 25, 2019
It almost seems like she's… stalking me. 🤪
— Diana Davison (@d2davison) November 25, 2019
November 25, 2019:
The next day Prause gets her Backpage.com lawyer to send a bogus cease and desist letter to Davison and The Post Millennial. All of Prause’s alleged wrongs are fabricated nonsense – as usual.
Check this out: Prause’s legal counsel is Wayne B. Giampietro, who was one of the primary lawyers defending backpage.com. Backpage was shut down by the federal government “for its willful facilitation of human trafficking and prostitution.” (see this USA Today article: 93-count indictment on sex trafficking charges revealed against Backpage founders). The indictment charged backpage owners, along with others, of conspiring to knowingly facilitate prostitution offenses through the website. Authorities contend some of the trafficked people included teenage girls. For details on Giampietro’s involvement see – https://dockets.justia.com/docket/illinois/ilndce/1:2017cv05081/341956. In an odd turn of events, backpage.com assets were seized by Arizona, with Wayne B. Giampietro LLC listed as forfeiting $100,000.
Continued threat against Davison, The Post Millennial, and two other twitter accounts in the Davison thread (note: Prause had already blocked Davison).
Notice how Prause’s C&D letter says “RE: Your Brain On Porn.” Evidence that she is probably the one writing the bogus C&D’s, not her lawyer.
Diana Davison responds to Prause’s harassment and bogus C&D letter.
That she lied about attending the XRCO event and she's threatening to sue people who say they've seen a picture of her there. Also, falsely accusing people of stalking just for doing research and defending themselves.
— Diana Davison (@d2davison) November 25, 2019
Diana describes Prause demanding $10,000 to just go away.
It seems to me the demand for $10K was a form of attempted extortion.
— Diana Davison (@d2davison) November 26, 2019
Prause also tries to intimidate others in the Davison thread:
Thing is, that's not the law. You should contact me on DMs
— Diana Davison (@d2davison) November 26, 2019
Other accounts educate Davison’s on the ways of the porn industry shills:
What's going on with her? Survey says… Unhinged!
— Diana Davison (@d2davison) November 26, 2019
Davison is not intimidated by Prause:
So I've just been threatened with a bogus lawsuit for saying things that are provably true. Interesting. For the person issuing this threat: I have an LA lawyer and you'll be hearing from him if you persist in this attempt at silencing my speech.
— Diana Davison (@d2davison) November 26, 2019
The problem with your question is that the person alleging defamation claims I said things I didn't. What I said is that a person was in a place where photos prove she was. She's alleging I said she was somewhere else which I have no interest in.
— Diana Davison (@d2davison) November 26, 2019
November 26, 2019:
Weird year indeed. I did my own investigation and agree with your conclusion but disagree on some of your other statements. Disagreement isn't defamation is it? Meanwhile Prause is threatening to sue me now for stating the truth. She's the biggest nutter in No Nut November.
— Diana Davison (@d2davison) November 26, 2019
To clarify, when I say "stating the truth" I mean she wants to sue me for producing a picture of her at a porn award show that she claims she didn't attend.
— Diana Davison (@d2davison) November 26, 2019
December 19, 2019: Prause apparently scared Tiki-Toki.com into taking down Davison’s timeline of Prause’s defamation & harassment.
To be honest, I kind of feel like I should have an affidavit of being bullied in the lawsuits now. Just got a notice that Prause had my timeline documentation removed from the website that allowed me to track her nefarious activities.
— Diana Davison (@d2davison) December 20, 2019
Note: Months have passed and Davison’s Post Millennial article remains, as do all of Davison’s tweets. More empty, unmerited threats by Prause.
March 10, 2020: Evidently Diana Davison received emails from more victims of Prause. It never ends:
At what point can Nicole Prause be declared a vexatious litigant? I'm getting messages and screenshots from numerous people of her saying she's suing them… and she doesn't. Because she knows she can't.
— Diana Davison (@d2davison) March 10, 2020
Davison continues:
Hmm. Criminal harassment has to be repeated unwanted contact after being told the target is afraid of you. I'm not afraid of her. She threatens then disappears so I don't think it would meet the threshold. And she's like buckshot scattering her threats without follow up.
— Diana Davison (@d2davison) March 10, 2020
I disagree. I recently attended an anti-SLAPP hearing in which they said the threat of litigation is deemed equivalent to actual litigation.
— Diana Davison (@d2davison) March 10, 2020
Davison ends with what many of us know to be true:
A fucking nutter. Obsessed with saying porn has no addictive qualities or downsides. She'll sue anyone who calls her a nutter or points out inconvenient facts that interfere with her academic neutrality.
— Diana Davison (@d2davison) March 10, 2020
Related
While spending her waking hours harassing others, Prause cleverly cultivated – with zero verifiable evidence – a myth that she was “the victim” of most anyone who dared to disagree with her assertions surrounding porn’s effects or the current state of porn research (See: Nicole Prause’s fabrications of victim-hood exposed as groundless: she is the perpetrator, not the victim). To counter the ongoing harassment and false claims, YBOP was compelled to document some of Prause’s activities. Consider the following pages. (Additional incidents have occurred that we are not at liberty to divulge – as Prause’s victims fear further retribution.)
- Nicole Prause’s Unethical Harassment and Defamation of Gary Wilson & Others
- Nicole Prause’s Unethical Harassment and Defamation of Gary Wilson & Others (Page 2)
- Nicole Prause’s Unethical Harassment and Defamation of Gary Wilson & Others (Page 3)
- Nicole Prause’s Unethical Harassment and Defamation of Gary Wilson & Others (Page 4)
- Victims of Nicole Prause’s Malicious Reporting and Malicious Use of Process.
- Nicole Prause & David Ley libelous claim that Gary Wilson was fired from Southern Oregon University
- Prause’s efforts to have Behavioral Sciences review paper (Park et al., 2016) retracted
- Article by University of Wisconsin student newspaper (The Racquet) posts false police report by Nicole Prause (March, 2019)
- Aggressive Trademark Infringement Waged by Porn Addiction Deniers (www.realyourbrainonporn.com)
- Nicole Prause, David Ley & @BrainOnPorn’s long history of harassing & defaming Alexander Rhodes of NoFap
- Nicole Prause & David Ley commit perjury in Don Hilton defamation lawsuit.
- Prause’s efforts to silence Wilson foiled; her restraining order denied as frivolous & she owes substantial attorney fees in a SLAPP ruling