Decreased modulation by the risk level on the brain activation during decision making in adolescents with internet gaming disorder (2015)

Front Behav Neurosci. 2015; 9: 296.

Published online 2015 Nov 3. doi:  10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00296

PMCID: PMC4630310

 

Abstract

Greater impulse and risk-taking and reduced decision-making ability were reported as the main behavioral impairments in individuals with internet gaming disorder (IGD), which has become a serious mental health issue worldwide. However, it is not clear to date how the risk level modulates brain activity during the decision-making process in IGD individuals. In this study, 23 adolescents with IGD and 24 healthy controls (HCs) without IGD were recruited, and the balloon analog risk task (BART) was used in a functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment to evaluate the modulation of the risk level (the probability of balloon explosion) on brain activity during risky decision making in IGD adolescents. Reduced modulation of the risk level on the activation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) during the active BART was found in IGD group compared to the HCs. In the IGD group, there was a significant negative correlation between the risk-related DLPFC activation during the active BART and the Barratt impulsivity scale (BIS-11) scores, which were significantly higher in IGD group compared with the HCs. Our study demonstrated that, as a critical decision-making-related brain region, the right DLPFC is less sensitive to risk in IGD adolescents compared with the HCs, which may contribute to the higher impulsivity level in IGD adolescents.

Keywords: internet gaming disorder, BART, dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex, fMRI, risky decision-making

Introduction

Internet gaming disorder has become increasingly prevalent around the world, especially in Asia (; ), and results in an adverse impact on various behavioral and psychosocial aspects (). Behavioral research suggested that a reduced risky decision-making ability is one of the most important behavioral impairments in IGD individuals (; ). For instance, researchers found that IGD individuals made more disadvantageous choices on the Game of Dice Task compare with HCs and that such an impairments may be partly the result of failure to utilize feedback (; ). Moreover, studies revealed that IGD subjects show a diminished consideration of experiential outcomes when making future decisions (). Risky decision making is a high-level cognitive function and is essential for human survival in an uncertain environment (). Risk aversion is an essential part of the decision-making process in a normal population (). However, IGD individuals tend to exhibit disadvantageous risky decision making and encounter more adverse situations (), which may lead to a negative effect on IGD individuals and society. Therefore, it is important to investigate the neural mechanisms underlying the altered risky decision making in IGD individuals.

The neural circuits related to risky decision making were wildly examined in healthy subjects, and a distributed subcortical-cortical network mainly consisting of prefrontal, parietal, limbic, and subcortical regions was found to be involved in risky decision making (; ; ; ; ), and the brain activation levels in these regions were found to be associated with the risk level (; ; ; ; ). However, few neuroimaging studies focused on the effect of IGD on the neural substrates for risky decision making. A fMRI study by found that individuals with internet addiction disorder required more brain resources to complete the decision-making task and ignored the feedback of previous outcome, which is an essential feature of risky decision making in HCs. A study by revealed that activation levels of the left inferior frontal gyrus and left precentral gyrus decreased in IGD individuals when performing a probability discounting task, which suggested impaired risk evaluation in IGD individuals. Although these studies suggested that the IGD is associated with abnormal brain activity during risky decision-making processes, how the risk level modulates brain activation during decision making is still poorly understood in IGD individuals. To our knowledge, no study thus far focused on the covariance between brain activation and the risk levels during the decision-making process in IGD individuals, which may advance current understanding of the mechanisms underlying decision-making deficits in IGD individuals.

In this study, 23 IGD adolescents and 24 HCs were enrolled, and fMRI data were obtained while the participants performed the BART () to evaluate how the risk level modulates brain activation during decision-making processes in IGD adolescents compared to the HCs. The BART, in which participants inflate virtual balloon that can either grow larger or explode, provides an ecologically valid model to assess human risk-taking propensity and behavior and provides participants with a choice in determining the risk level for each balloon; the larger the balloon was inflated, the greater the risk that the participants are taking. Unlike other risk tasks, the risk in the BART was more directly and ecologically defined as the probability of explosion for each balloon; thus, the BART is adaptive in terms of evaluating the modulation of the risk level on brain activation during the decision-making process. The BART has been successfully used in healthy volunteers, and multiple brain regions were demonstrated to be related to the risk, including the DLPFC, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, ACC/medial frontal cortex, striatum, and insula (; ; ; ). The BART has also been used in addiction studies, and the abnormal brain activation was detected in the DLPFC and striatum of methamphetamine-addicted individuals (), and in the prefrontal cortex and ACC of alcohol-dependence individuals (; ). As a special behavioral addiction (; ), IGD may also affect the activity in the risk-related brain regions. Thus, in this study, we used fMRI with BART to investigate whether the modulation of the risk level on the brain activation during the decision-making process is altered in IGD adolescents when compared to HCs. This study will contribute to the understanding of the neuro mechanisms of the risk-taking and impulsive behaviors in IGD adolescents.

Materials and Methods

Participant Selection

Because the diagnostic standards for IGD are still ambiguous (; ), relatively strict inclusion criteria were selected in this study. First, the YDQ for internet addiction () was used to determine the presence of an internet addiction disorder. YDQ consisted of eight “yes” or “no” questions regarding internet use. Participants who reported five or more “yes” answers were diagnosed as having an internet addiction disorder (). A score of 50 or higher on IAT () was used as the second inclusion criteria. In addition, only IGD adolescents who reported themselves as spending an average of four or more hours/day playing internet games (>80% of total online time) were recruited. According to these inclusion criteria, 26 right-handed male IGD adolescents were recruited in this study. Only the male subjects were examined because of the relatively small number of females with internet gaming experience. Twenty-five male participants were recruited as HCs. HCs were defined as subjects who did not fit the criteria for a YDQ diagnosis, spend less than 2 h per day on the internet, and whose IAT score was less than 50. All the participants were medication free, and reported no history of substance abuse or head injuries. The impulsivity was evaluated for all participants with the BIS-11 (). The IQ of all participants was tested using SPM. The data from three of 26 IGD adolescents and one of 25 HCs were discarded from this study because of obvious head motion during the fMRI experiment (maximum displacement in any cardinal directions is more than 2 mm and/or maximum spin is more than 2°). The data for the remaining 23 IGD adolescents and 24 HCs were used for further analysis. Age, education, and IQ were matched well between the two groups, and the BIS scores and IAT scores were significantly higher in IGD group than in HCs (Table ​Table11).

Table 1 

Demographic and clinical characteristics of subjects (Mean ± SD).

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Tianjin Medical University General Hospital and written informed consent was obtained from each subject.

Task and Procedure

In the present study, we adapted the fMRI-adapted version of the BART used by . Briefly, the participants were presented a virtual balloon and asked to press one of two buttons to either inflate (pump) the balloon or cash out. The larger balloons were associated with greater rewards and greater risk of explosion. Participants could stop inflating the balloon at any point to win the wager or continue inflation until the balloon explodes, in which case they lose the wager. The maximum number of pumps that participants could use for each balloon was 12. A control cue (the color of a small circle changed from red to green) was used to instruct the participants to begin inflation. After the participants successfully pressed a button and pumped the balloon, the small circle immediately turned red at a random interval of between 1.5 and 2.5 s. The cue then turned green again to indicate the next inflation period. After the end of each balloon trial, there was also a varying 2–4 s interval before the next balloon trial. The win or loss picture was presented for 1.5 s. The picture of the exploded balloon was presented for 20 ms. The risk of balloon explosion (the probability of balloon explosion) was defined as the “risk level.” The covariance between the risk level and the activation of the brain regions was defined as the “modulation.”

We used two modes of BART in our study: active choice and passive no-choice modes. In the active choice mode, the participants could determine the risk level and decided to either inflate the balloon or cash out. However, in the passive no-choice mode, the participants merely inflated the balloon continually while the computer determined the end point as well as the win or loss for each balloon. The number of balloons that participants completed during the scan was not pre-determined but depended on the response speed in either active or passive modes. The only difference between the two modes is the option in the active mode to discontinue the inflation and win the wager. The brain activation levels of the active choice mode compared to the passive no-choice mode (active-passive) reflect the neural basis of the decision-making process. After the experiment, the participants received the equivalent amount of money earned during the active mode experiment.

Data Acquisition

The functional MRI was conducted on a Siemens 3.0T scanner (Magnetom Verio, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) using a gradient-recalled echo planar imaging sequence with the following parameters: repetition time (TR) = 2000 ms, echo time (TE) = 30 ms, field of view = 220 mm × 220 mm, matrix = 64 × 64, slice thickness = 4 mm, and slice gap = 1 mm. The task stimuli were projected onto a display screen in front of the magnet’s bore and the participants viewed the stimuli through a mirror installed on the head coil. The participants responded to the task by pressing the button on the fMRI-compatible response box. The formal experiment was performed after the participants learned and practiced the tasks. All of the participants completed two 10 min functional runs, one for each task mode. The scanning order of the two tasks was counterbalanced across the participants within each group.

Behavioral Analysis

In the fMRI experiment, the behavioral variables of the BART included the trial number, total and mean number of pumps, number of wins and losses, adjusted number of pumps (defined as the average number of pumps excluding the balloons that exploded), the reward collection rate (the number of win trials divided by the number of total trials), and average RT for all pumps. Only behavioral data during the active mode was analyzed because the participants were forced to accept the outcome determined by computer for each balloon during the passive mode. A two-sample t-test was used to compare the difference in the behavioral data during the active mode between the IGD individuals and the HCs. Statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS 21.0, and the significance level was set at P < 0.05.

Functional MRI Data Preprocessing

Functional MRI data preprocessing were conducted using SPM8 (http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm8). For each participant, the functional images were corrected for the acquisition time delay between the different slices and corrected geometric displacements according to the estimated head movement. The images were then realigned with the first volume. Based on the motion correction estimates, participants who demonstrated a maximum displacement in any of the x, y, or z directions greater than 2-mm or more than 2° of angular rotation (x, y, or z) were excluded from this study. Following this step, all realigned images were spatially normalized to the MNI EPI template, resampled to 3 mm × 3 mm × 3 mm, and subsequently smoothed with a 6 mm FWHM.

Statistical Analysis

The GLM was used for voxel-based individual data analysis. The BOLD time series data were modeled using a standard HRF with a time derivative. The head movement parameters of each subject were modeled as covariates of no interest. A high-pass filter with a cut-off at 128 s was used to remove low frequency fluctuations.

The GLM included three types of events resulted from a button press: an inflation of the balloon, a win outcome, or a loss outcome. Thus, the GLM for either active or passive task included three regressors that represent three types of events, respectively. The risk level associated with each inflation (i.e., the probability of explosion, orthogonalized by a mean central correction) was also entered into the model as a linear parametric modulation of the balloon inflation regressor. For each subject, the risk-related contrast in active and passive tasks was defined to examine the brain activations that covaried with the risk level.

The second level random effect analyses were conducted by using a 2 (group: IGD and HCs) × 2 (choice mode: active and passive) ANOVA on the risk-related contrasts with full factorial in SPM8, and the risk-related contrasts in the active and passive modes within the same participant were processed as repeated measures. In this study, the main aim was to evaluate the intergroup difference of the risk-related brain activation during the decision-making process, which can be reflected by the activation seen in the active mode compared to the passive mode (active–passive). Therefore, the interactive effect between the group and choice mode, HCs (active–passive) – IGD (active–passive), was analyzed in this study. A correction for multiple comparisons was performed using the Monte Carlo simulation, resulting in a corrected threshold of P < 0.05 (AlphaSim program, parameters including: single voxel P = 0.005, 1000 simulations, full width at half maximum = 6 mm, cluster connection radius r = 5 mm, and the mask of global gray matter). The brain regions with interactive effects were established as ROIs. The average β estimates within ROIs were extracted and a post hoc t-test was conducted.

The correlation between the average β estimates within ROIs, BIS scores, and IAT scores were examined with a Pearson’s correlation analysis in IGD group with SPSS 21.0. The significance level was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Behavioral Results

Table ​Table22 shows the behavioral results during the fMRI experiment. The two-sample t-test revealed that the average RT was shorter in IGD group than in the HCs while the active mode took place (P = 0.03), the number of the total pumps was significantly more in the IGD group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the adjusted number of pumps, trial number, mean number of pumps, number of wins and losses, and the reward collection rate.

Table 2 

The behavioral results of the BART during active functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment (Mean ± SD).

Imaging Results

A 2 (group: IGD and HCs) × 2 (choice mode: active and passive) ANOVA on the risk-related contrasts revealed a significant interactive effect on the activation of the right DLPFC (MNI coordinate: 24, 54, 12; voxels: 38; t = 3.78; P < 0.05, AlphaSim correction; Figure ​Figure1A1A). The post hoc t-test revealed that the modulation of the risk level on the activation of the right DLPFC was higher in active mode than in passive mode in HCs, but showed no significant difference between the active and passive modes in the IGD group. During the active mode, the modulation of the risk level on the activation of the right DLPFC significantly decreased in the IGD group compared with the HCs (Figure ​Figure1B1B). In addition, a significant interactive effect was also found for the activation of the left cerebellum (MNI coordinate: -9, -78, -21; voxels: 72; t = 4.13; P < 0.05, AlphaSim correction; Figure ​Figure2A2A). The post hoc t-test revealed that the difference in the modulation of the risk level on the activation of the left cerebellum between the modes and between the groups had similar features to whose seen in the right DLPFC (Figure ​Figure2B2B).

FIGURE 1 

The intergroup difference in the modulation by the risk level on the brain activation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). (A) The modulation by the risk level on the brain activation of the right DLPFC shows intergroup difference. (B) …
FIGURE 2 

The intergroup difference in the modulation by the risk level on the brain activation of the left cerebellum. (A) The modulation by the risk level on the brain activation of the left cerebellum shows intergroup difference. (B) ROI analysis shows that …

The modulation of the risk level on the activation of the right DLPFC during the active mode showed a significantly negative correlation with the BIS total scores in the IGD group (Figure ​Figure33). There was no significant correlation between the activation of the right DLPFC and IAT scores in the IGD group. In addition, no significant correlation was found between the fMRI results and the behavioral data during decision making.

FIGURE 3 

Correlation between the β estimates within the ROI of the right DLPFC and Barratt impulsivity scale (BIS) total scores in IGD group.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the modulation of the risk level on the brain activation during the decision-making process in IGD adolescents by using a BART fMRI. Decreased risk-related activations of the right DLPFC during active decision making were found in the IGD group compared with the HCs, which suggested that the activation of the right DLPFC was less sensitive to the risk level in the IGD group than in the HCs. The modulation of the risk on the activation of the right DLPFC during the active decision-making process was negatively correlated with the BIS score in the IGD group. These findings may contribute to the understanding of the neural mechanisms of higher impulsivity in IGD adolescents.

Risky decision making likely draws upon several brain processes that are involved in the estimations of value and risk, executive control, and emotional processing (). The DLPFC is a critical brain region involved in executive control (; ) that regulates goal-oriented, flexible, and effective behavior and may mediate decision making with explicit risk (; ). The altered structure and function of the DLPFC has been demonstrated in IGD individuals (; ; ), which were consistent with the findings in studies on substance addiction (; ) and behavioral addiction (). During decision making, the DLPFC activity may mediate the integration of information about risk and value (), represent prospects, evaluate outcomes, and calculate the subsequent utility (). The IGD adolescents usually presented with impaired executive control ability (; ); therefore, it is plausible to postulate that the decreased risk-related activation of the right DLPFC during risky decision making in IGD adolescents may reflect the impaired executive control function that mediated adverse choices during risky situations. In this study, the right but not the left DLPFC showed decreased risk-related activation in IGD adolescents compared with the HCs. This laterality of the right as opposed to the left DLPFC activity mediating risky decision making was also reported in other BART fMRI studies (; ; ; ) and the transcranial direct-current stimulation studies (). Furthermore, this laterality of decreased activation in the right DLPFC was also found in drugs-addicted individuals when they performed a series of risky decision-making tasks (; ; ). Taken together, these results implicated that the right DLPFC was a key region for risky decision making, and the possible neural mechanism underlying the alteration of the DLPFC activation in IGD adolescents may be similar to that in individuals with substance abuse issue.

Recently, the IGD has been conceptualized as a behavioral addiction or an impulse-control disorder (; ), and may be associated with inhibition function impairment (; ), which is similar to that in the other behavioral addiction (), such as pathological gambling (; ). A review suggested that impulsive inhibition is a part of decision-making function (), and research has successfully demonstrated that the DLPFC has an important role in the impulsive inhibition process (; ; ,; ). In the current study, the higher BIS-11 scores in IGD individuals compared with the HCs implicated a higher impulsivity in IGD adolescents, which was consistent with the findings in other studies on impulsive control in IGD individuals (; ; ). Therefore, the decreased modulation of the risk level on the activation of the right DLPFC in IGD adolescents in our study may be associated with impulsive inhibition impairments. Furthermore, a significant negative correlation was found between the decreased modulation of the risk level on the activation of the right DLPFC during the active choice and the BIS-11 score in IGD adolescents, which means that the IGD adolescents with higher impulsivity showed lower modulation of the risk level on activation of the right DLPFC during the decision-making process. The right DLPFC activation was less sensitive to risk during the decision-making process in IGD adolescents with higher impulsive propensities. The decreased modulation of the risk level on the activation of the right DLPFC in IGD adolescents may mediate their ignoring the risk.

Our study found that, besides the right DLPFC, the modulation of the risk level on the activation of the left cerebellum also decreased during the active decision-making process in the IGD group. Although alterations in cerebellum activation had been reported in previous fMRI studies with BART (; ,; ) and other tasks that involved the decision-making processes (; ), the neural mechanism has not been clearly determined. Previous studies have found that the cerebellum is a critical component in addiction issues (; ), and the gray matter volume of the cerebellum, especially left cerebellum, reduced in subjects with substance disorder (). Moreover, the decreased gray matter volume () and the enhanced regional homogeneity () in the left cerebellum has also been reported in IGD individuals. Therefore, it is worth performing further studies involved in the association between the cerebellum activity and the risky decision making in IGD individuals.

Several limitations should be considered in the present study. First, the sample size was relatively small, which may reduce the power and fail to detect some brain activations with slight significance. Second, the maximum number of possible balloon pumps in this modified BART task was reduced to 12, and most participants completed only about 30 balloon trials during the 10 min of BOLD scanning. Thus, the limitations inherent in this experimental design may have decreased the sensitivity of detecting intergroup differences in behavioral performance (). Finally, the causal relationship between the altered brain activation and IGD cannot be determined with this cross-sectional study. A longitudinal study may be helpful for evaluating this relationship.

Conclusion

This is believed to be the first study to test the modulation of the risk level on brain activation during the decision-making process with the BART in IGD adolescents. Our study demonstrated that the modulation of the risk level on the activation of the right DLPFC decreased in IGD adolescents, and the decreased risk-related activation of the right DLPFC was negatively correlated with the BIS scores. Our findings suggested that, as a critical brain region related to the decision making, the right DLPFC is less sensitive to the risk level in IGD adolescents compared with the HCs, which may contribute to the higher impulsivity in IGD adolescents.

Author Contributions

XQ, YY, XL, and QZ designed research; XQ, XD, PG, YZ, GD, and QZ performed research; YY, PG was involved in the clinical assessment; XQ, YZ, GD, WQ, and QZ analyzed data; XQ, YZ, XL, YY, and QZ wrote the paper.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

ABBREVIATIONS

ACCanterior cingulate
BARTballoon analog risk task
BIS-11Barratt impulsivity scale
DLPFCdorsolateral prefrontal cortex
fMRIfunctional magnetic resonance imaging
FWHMfull-width at half-maximum
GLMgeneral linear model
HChealthy controls
HRFhemodynamic response function
IATYoung’s online internet addiction test
IGDinternet gaming disorder
IQIntelligence Quotient
MNIMontreal Neurological Institute
ROIregion of interest
RTresponse time
SPMStandard Raven’s ProgressiveMatrices
SPM8Statistical Parametric Mapping software
YDQYoung Diagnostic Questionnaire
 

References

  • Asahi S., Okamoto Y., Okada G., Yamawaki S., Yokota N. (2004). Negative correlation between right prefrontal activity during response inhibition and impulsiveness: a fMRI study. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 254 245–251. 10.1007/s00406-004-0488-z [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Bari A., Robbins T. W. (2013). Inhibition and impulsivity: behavioral and neural basis of response control. Prog. Neurobiol. 108 44–79. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.06.005 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Blaszczynski A. (2008). Commentary: a response to “problems with the concept of video game “addiction”: some case study examples”. Int. J. Mental Health Addict. 6 179–181. 10.1007/s11469-007-9132-2 [Cross Ref]
  • Bogg T., Fukunaga R., Finn P. R., Brown J. W. (2012). Cognitive control links alcohol use, trait disinhibition, and reduced cognitive capacity: evidence for medial prefrontal cortex dysregulation during reward-seeking behavior. Drug Alcohol Depend. 122 112–118. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.09.018 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Bolla K. I., Eldreth D. A., Matochik J. A., Cadet J. L. (2005). Neural substrates of faulty decision-making in abstinent marijuana users. Neuroimage 26 480–492. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.012 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Brand M., Labudda K., Markowitsch H. J. (2006). Neuropsychological correlates of decision-making in ambiguous and risky situations. Neural Netw. 19 1266–1276. 10.1016/j.neunet.2006.03.001 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Carli V., Durkee T., Wasserman D., Hadlaczky G., Despalins R., Kramarz E., et al. (2013). The association between pathological internet use and comorbid psychopathology: a systematic review. Psychopathology 46 1–13. 10.1159/000337971 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Claus E. D., Hutchison K. E. (2012). Neural mechanisms of risk taking and relationships with hazardous drinking. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 36 932–940. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01694.x [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Crockford D. N., Goodyear B., Edwards J., Quickfall J., El-Guebaly N. (2005). Cue-induced brain activity in pathological gamblers. Biol. Psychiatry 58 787–795. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.04.037 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ding W. N., Sun J. H., Sun Y. W., Chen X., Zhou Y., Zhuang Z. G., et al. (2014). Trait impulsivity and impaired prefrontal impulse inhibition function in adolescents with internet gaming addiction revealed by a Go/No-Go fMRI study. Behav. Brain Funct. 10:20 10.1186/1744-9081-10-20 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Dong G., Hu Y., Lin X., Lu Q. (2013). What makes Internet addicts continue playing online even when faced by severe negative consequences? Possible explanations from an fMRI study. Biol. Psychol. 94 282–289. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.07.009 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Dong G., Huang J., Du X. (2012). Alterations in regional homogeneity of resting-statstatie brain activity in internet gaming addicts. Behav. Brain Funct. 8:41 10.1186/1744-9081-8-41 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Dong G., Lin X., Hu Y., Xie C., Du X. (2015). Imbalanced functional link between executive control network and reward network explain the online-game seeking behaviors in Internet gaming disorder. Sci. Rep. 5:9197 10.1038/srep09197 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Dong G., Potenza M. N. (2014). A cognitive-behavioral model of Internet gaming disorder: theoretical underpinnings and clinical implications. J. Psychiatr. Res. 58 7–11. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.07.005 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ernst M., Paulus M. P. (2005). Neurobiology of decision making: a selective review from a neurocognitive and clinical perspective. Biol. Psychiatry 58 597–604. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.06.004 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ersche K. D., Fletcher P. C., Lewis S. J., Clark L., Stocks-Gee G., London M., et al. (2005). Abnormal frontal activations related to decision-making in current and former amphetamine and opiate dependent individuals. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 180 612–623. 10.1007/s00213-005-2205-7 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Gabay A. S., Radua J., Kempton M. J., Mehta M. A. (2014). The ultimatum game and the brain: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 47 549–558. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.10.014 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Galván A., Schonberg T., Mumford J., Kohno M., Poldrack R. A., London E. D. (2013). Greater risk sensitivity of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in young smokers than in nonsmokers. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 229 345–355. 10.1007/s00213-013-3113-x [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Garavan H., Hester R., Murphy K., Fassbender C., Kelly C. (2006). Individual differences in the functional neuroanatomy of inhibitory control. Brain Res. 1105 130–142. 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.03.029 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Gorini A., Lucchiari C., Russell-Edu W., Pravettoni G. (2014). Modulation of risky choices in recently abstinent dependent cocaine users: a transcranial direct-current stimulation study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:661 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00661 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Gowin J. L., Mackey S., Paulus M. P. (2013). Altered risk-related processing in substance users: imbalance of pain and gain. Drug Alcohol Depend. 132 13–21. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.03.019 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Grant J. E., Potenza M. N., Weinstein A., Gorelick D. A. (2010). Introduction to behavioral addictions. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 36 233–241. 10.3109/00952990.2010.491884 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Griffiths M. D. (2008). Videogame addiction: further thoughts and observations. Int. J. Mental Health Addict. 6 182–185. 10.1007/s11469-007-9128-y [Cross Ref]
  • Hastie R. (2001). Problems of judgment and decision making. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52 653–683. 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.653 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Helfinstein S. M., Schonberg T., Congdon E., Karlsgodt K. H., Mumford J. A., Sabb F. W., et al. (2014). Predicting risky choices from brain activity patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111 2470–2475. 10.1073/pnas.1321728111 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Karim R., Chaudhri P. (2012). Behavioral addictions: an overview. J. Psychoactive Drugs 44 5–17. 10.1080/02791072.2012.662859 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ko C. H., Hsiao S., Liu G. C., Yen J. Y., Yang M. J., Yen C. F. (2010). The characteristics of decision making, potential to take risks, and personality of college students with Internet addiction. Psychiatry Res. 175 121–125. 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.10.004 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ko C. H., Hsieh T. J., Chen C. Y., Yen C. F., Chen C. S., Yen J. Y., et al. (2014). Altered brain activation during response inhibition and error processing in subjects with Internet gaming disorder: a functional magnetic imaging study. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 264 661–672. 10.1007/s00406-013-0483-3 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ko C. H., Liu G. C., Yen J. Y., Chen C. Y., Yen C. F., Chen C. S. (2013). Brain correlates of craving for online gaming under cue exposure in subjects with Internet gaming addiction and in remitted subjects. Addict. Biol. 18 559–569. 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2011.00405.x [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kohno M., Ghahremani D. G., Morales A. M., Robertson C. L., Ishibashi K., Morgan A. T., et al. (2015). Risk-taking behavior: dopamine d2/d3 receptors, feedback, and frontolimbic activity. Cereb. Cortex 25 236–245. 10.1093/cercor/bht218 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kohno M., Morales A. M., Ghahremani D. G., Hellemann G., London E. D. (2014). Risky decision making, prefrontal cortex, and mesocorticolimbic functional connectivity in methamphetamine dependence. JAMA Psychiatry 71 812–820. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.399 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Krain A. L., Wilson A. M., Arbuckle R., Castellanos F. X., Milham M. P. (2006). Distinct neural mechanisms of risk and ambiguity: a meta-analysis of decision-making. Neuroimage 32 477–484. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.047 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kräplin A., Dshemuchadse M., Behrendt S., Scherbaum S., Goschke T., Bühringer G. (2014). Dysfunctional decision-making in pathological gambling: pattern specificity and the role of impulsivity. Psychiatry Res. 215 675–682. 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.12.041 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kühn S., Romanowski A., Schilling C., Mobascher A., Warbrick T., Winterer G., et al. (2012). Brain grey matter deficits in smokers: focus on the cerebellum. Brain Struct. Funct. 217 517–522. 10.1007/s00429-011-0346-5 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kuss D. J. (2013). Internet gaming addiction: current perspectives. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 6 125–137. 10.2147/PRBM.S39476 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lejuez C. W., Read J. P., Kahler C. W., Richards J. B., Ramsey S. E., Stuart G. L., et al. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: the balloon analogue risk task (BART). J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 8 75–84. 10.1037//1076-898X.8.2.75 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lin X., Zhou H., Dong G., Du X. (2015). Impaired risk evaluation in people with Internet gaming disorder: fMRI evidence from a probability discounting task. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 56 142–148. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2014.08.016 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Liu G. C., Yen J. Y., Chen C. Y., Yen C. F., Chen C. S., Lin W. C., et al. (2014). Brain activation for response inhibition under gaming cue distraction in internet gaming disorder. Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci. 30 43–51. 10.1016/j.kjms.2013.08.005 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Macoveanu J., Rowe J. B., Hornboll B., Elliott R., Paulson O. B., Knudsen G. M., et al. (2013). Playing it safe but losing anyway–serotonergic signaling of negative outcomes in dorsomedial prefrontal cortex in the context of risk-aversion. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 23 919–930. 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2012.09.006 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Metcalf O., Pammer K. (2014). Impulsivity and related neuropsychological features in regular and addictive first person shooter gaming. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 17 147–152. 10.1089/cyber.2013.0024 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Miedl S. F., Peters J., Büchel C. (2012). Altered neural reward representations in pathological gamblers revealed by delay and probability discounting. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 69 177–186. 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1552 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Moeller S. J., Froböse M. I., Konova A. B., Misyrlis M., Parvaz M. A., Goldstein R. Z., et al. (2014). Common and distinct neural correlates of inhibitory dysregulation: stroop fMRI study of cocaine addiction and intermittent explosive disorder. J. Psychiatr. Res. 58 55–62. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.07.016 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Moreno-López L., Perales J. C., Van Son D., Albein-Urios N., Soriano-Mas C., Martinez-Gonzalez J. M., et al. (2015). Cocaine use severity and cerebellar gray matter are associated with reversal learning deficits in cocaine-dependent individuals. Addict. Biol. 20 546–556. 10.1111/adb.12143 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Moulton E. A., Elman I., Becerra L. R., Goldstein R. Z., Borsook D. (2014). The cerebellum and addiction: insights gained from neuroimaging research. Addict. Biol. 19 317–331. 10.1111/adb.12101 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Nakata H., Sakamoto K., Ferretti A., Gianni Perrucci M., Del Gratta C., Kakigi R., et al. (2008a). Somato-motor inhibitory processing in humans: an event-related functional MRI study. Neuroimage 39 1858–1866. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.041 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Nakata H., Sakamoto K., Ferretti A., Gianni Perrucci M., Del Gratta C., Kakigi R., et al. (2008b). Executive functions with different motor outputs in somatosensory Go/Nogo tasks: an event-related functional MRI study. Brain Res. Bull. 77 197–205. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.07.008 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Patton J. H., Stanford M. S., Barratt E. S. (1995). Factor structure of the barratt impulsiveness scale. J. Clin. Psychol. 51 768–774. [PubMed]
  • Pawlikowski M., Brand M. (2011). Excessive Internet gaming and decision making: do excessive World of Warcraft players have problems in decision making under risky conditions? Psychiatry Res. 188 428–433. 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.05.017 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Probst C. C., van Eimeren T. (2013). The functional anatomy of impulse control disorders. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 13:386 10.1007/s11910-013-0386-8 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rao H., Korczykowski M., Pluta J., Hoang A., Detre J. A. (2008). Neural correlates of voluntary and involuntary risk taking in the human brain: an fMRI Study of the Balloon Analog Risk Task (BART). NeuroImage 42 902–910. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.046 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rao H., Mamikonyan E., Detre J. A., Siderowf A. D., Stern M. B., Potenza M. N., et al. (2010). Decreased ventral striatal activity with impulse control disorders in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 25 1660–1669. 10.1002/mds.23147 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rao L. L., Zhou Y., Liang Z. Y., Rao H., Zheng R., Sun Y., et al. (2014). Decreasing ventromedial prefrontal cortex deactivation in risky decision making after simulated microgravity: effects of -6 degrees head-down tilt bed rest. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 8:187 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00187 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rosenbloom M. H., Schmahmann J. D., Price B. H. (2012). The functional neuroanatomy of decision-making. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 24 266–277. 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.11060139 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sakagami M., Pan X., Uttl B. (2006). Behavioral inhibition and prefrontal cortex in decision-making. Neural Netw. 19 1255–1265. 10.1016/j.neunet.2006.05.040 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Schiebener J., Wegmann E., Pawlikowski M., Brand M. (2012). Anchor effects in decision making can be reduced by the interaction between goal monitoring and the level of the decision maker’s executive functions. Cogn. Process. 13 321–332. 10.1007/s10339-012-0522-4 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Schonberg T., Fox C. R., Mumford J. A., Congdon E., Trepel C., Poldrack R. A. (2012). Decreasing ventromedial prefrontal cortex activity during sequential risk-taking: an fMRI investigation of the balloon analog risk task. Front. Neurosci. 6:80 10.3389/fnins.2012.00080 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Tang J., Yu Y., Du Y., Ma Y., Zhang D., Wang J. (2014). Prevalence of internet addiction and its association with stressful life events and psychological symptoms among adolescent internet users. Addict. Behav. 39 744–747. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.12.010 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Telzer E. H., Fuligni A. J., Lieberman M. D., Galván A. (2013a). The effects of poor quality sleep on brain function and risk taking in adolescence. Neuroimage 71 275–283. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.025 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Telzer E. H., Fuligni A. J., Lieberman M. D., Galván A. (2013b). Meaningful family relationships: neurocognitive buffers of adolescent risk taking. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 25 374–387. 10.1162/jocn_a_00331 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Trepel C., Fox C. R., Poldrack R. A. (2005). Prospect theory on the brain? Toward a cognitive neuroscience of decision under risk. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 23 34–50. 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.01.016 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wang H., Jin C., Yuan K., Shakir T. M., Mao C., Niu X., et al. (2015). The alteration of gray matter volume and cognitive control in adolescents with internet gaming disorder. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 9:64 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00064 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wu X., Chen X., Han J., Meng H., Luo J., Nydegger L., et al. (2013). Prevalence and factors of addictive Internet use among adolescents in Wuhan, China: interactions of parental relationship with age and hyperactivity-impulsivity. PLoS ONE 8:e61782 10.1371/journal.pone.0061782 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Yao Y. W., Chen P. R., Chen C., Wang L. J., Zhang J. T., Xue G., et al. (2014). Failure to utilize feedback causes decision-making deficits among excessive Internet gamers. Psychiatry Res. 219 583–588. 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.06.033 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Yao Y. W., Chen P. R., Li S., Wang L. J., Zhang J. T., Yip S. W., et al. (2015). Decision-making for risky gains and losses among college students with Internet gaming disorder. PLoS ONE 10:e0116471 10.1371/journal.pone.0116471 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Young K. (1998). Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. CyberPsychol. Behav. 1 237–244. 10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237 [Cross Ref]
  • Young, K. S., Internet Addiction Test [IAT] (2009). Available at: http://netaddiction.com/index.php?option5combfquiz&view5onepage&catid546&Itemid5106
  • Yuan K., Qin W., Wang G., Zeng F., Zhao L., Yang X., et al. (2011). Microstructure abnormalities in adolescents with internet addiction disorder. PLoS ONE 6:e20708 10.1371/journal.pone.0020708 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Yuan P., Raz N. (2014). Prefrontal cortex and executive functions in healthy adults: a meta-analysis of structural neuroimaging studies. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 42 180–192. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.02.005 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zhou Z., Yuan G., Yao J. (2012). Cognitive biases toward Internet game-related pictures and executive deficits in individuals with an Internet game addiction. PLoS ONE 7:e48961 10.1371/journal.pone.0048961 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]